tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post2614848035567145518..comments2024-03-28T18:57:15.124-06:00Comments on Wash Park Prophet: Are Copyright Damages Unconstitutionally Large?Andrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-23943558578490004992010-07-16T13:54:26.848-06:002010-07-16T13:54:26.848-06:00Given that the Supreme Court in Eldred v. Ashcroft...Given that the Supreme Court in Eldred v. Ashcroft did not consider 90 years to be a "limited time" as specified by the Constitution (and more importantly, the succession of retroactive laws that effectively keep what is copyrighted perpetually in copyright), you are, sadly, probably correct on how the Supreme Court might rule on the Constitutionality of these monetary judgments.Michael Malakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10007582156392845677noreply@blogger.com