tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post4760381615863852157..comments2024-03-17T10:49:06.420-06:00Comments on Wash Park Prophet: Cease and Desist E-Mail ReceivedAndrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-27994053942485758082011-01-23T11:12:27.759-07:002011-01-23T11:12:27.759-07:00LEO STOLLER INDICTED ON FEDERAL FRAUD CHARGES
Leo...LEO STOLLER INDICTED ON FEDERAL FRAUD CHARGES<br /><br />Leo Stoller indicted for fraud.<br /><br />Read the document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/46454179/LEO-STOLLER-INDICTED-FOR-FRAUD<br /><br />Leo Stoller is not an attorney, but claims to be an expert in many areas of the law, including legal ethics, intellectual property, trademarks, and appellate practice. Leo Stoller represents himself to the public as the director of an organization called the “Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics” (AEAE), which he claims is an “attorney watch dog group” established in 1974.<br /><br />The federal defender program has been appointed to represent Leo Stoller against the fraud charges, after the court reviewed his Affidavit of Financial Status and was satisfied that Stoller is financially unable to employ counsel.Chili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-76400614029765644862010-05-12T23:37:53.271-06:002010-05-12T23:37:53.271-06:00U.S. DISTRICT COURT BANS LEO STOLLER
In a Memoran...U.S. DISTRICT COURT BANS LEO STOLLER<br /><br />In a Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division) on April 26, 2010, Chief Judge James F. Holderman clarifies the effect of a December 4, 2009 order issed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit regarding the filing ban imposed on Leo Stoller.<br /><br />The December 4, 2009 order issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit banned Leo Stoller from further filings in that court– in what is commonly referred to as a ‘Mack’ bar– for engaging in deceitful behavior. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that the Mack bar against Leo Stoller is to remain in effect until at least December 4, 2011.<br /><br />In the Opinion and Order issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern of Illinois, the Honorable James F. Holderman notes that the Seventh Circuit ordered ”‘the clerks of all federal courts in this circuit… to return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by [Leo] [Stoller] or on [Stoller's] behalf.’”<br /><br />Therefore, the U.S. District Court reasoned, the plain language of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ Order requires that Leo Stoller be barred from initiating any new lawsuits in the Northern District of Illinois, and that the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois cannot permit Leo Stoller to litigate his claims in that court. <br /><br />Read the document at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31292372/U-S-DISTRICT-COURT-BANS-LEO-STOLLERChili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-86432676665806710142010-03-21T14:25:53.862-06:002010-03-21T14:25:53.862-06:00LEO STOLLER'S APPEALS
DISMISSED EN MASSE
On ...LEO STOLLER'S APPEALS <br />DISMISSED EN MASSE<br /><br />On March 15, 2010, the Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) entered an order dismissing several appeals filed by Leo Stoller. The matter came before the court on the court’s own rule to show cause why Leo Stoller should not be held in contempt and the appeals dismissed.<br /><br />In this order, the Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) noted that it had taken judicial notice of an order entered by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the matter of In re Leo D. Stoller, No. 08-4240 (7th Cir., Dec. 4. 2009). In that order, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found that Leo Stoller had been deceptive and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney for determination of whether Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury.<br /><br />The Appellate Court of Illinois (First Judicial District) also noted that Leo Stoller had filed a response to the matter before it on February 19, 2010, and that Leo Stoller had contradicted himself in his response.<br /><br />This order follows a long history of sanctions against Leo Stoller. Several courts have noted that Leo Stoller’s “lack of credibility is a matter of public record.”<br /><br />Read the documents at: http://www.scribd.com/ChiliPalmer75<br /><br />The Leo Stoller Truth Serum Blog<br />http://stollerexposed.blogChili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-44163919377203650512010-02-28T10:18:26.752-07:002010-02-28T10:18:26.752-07:00On February 11, 2010, the Illinois Appellate Court...On February 11, 2010, the Illinois Appellate Court (First District) granted an order taking judicial notice that Leo Stoller had been deceptive.<br /><br />The Illinois Appellate Court, on its own motion, also ordered that Leo Stoller show cause as to why he should not be held in Contempt of Court regarding sixteen appeals. The Court also ordered Leo Stoller to show cause as to why those appeals should not be dismissed.<br /><br />The Illinois Appellate Court entered the orders in view of an earlier order entered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In that order, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Leo Stoller had been deceptive and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney to determine whether Leo Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury.<br /><br />Leo Stoller Truth Serum Blog<br />http://stollerexposed.blog.comChili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-61730847319612075002009-12-06T12:25:30.675-07:002009-12-06T12:25:30.675-07:00On December 4, 2009, the United States Court of Ap...On December 4, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered an order 1) finding that Leo Stoller had been deceptive and dismissing his appeal; 2) reinstating the Mack Bar against Stoller for at least two years; and 3) ordering that the matter be referred to the United States Attorney to consider whether Leo Stoller should be prosecuted for perjury. <br /><br />The Leo Stoller Truth Serum Blog<br />http://stollerexposed.blog.comChili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-68365411957635641512009-11-21T20:52:57.248-07:002009-11-21T20:52:57.248-07:00Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium? ...Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium? <br />Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-17336856580937184842009-09-05T11:43:26.441-06:002009-09-05T11:43:26.441-06:00In the words of the King (and that would be Elvis)...In the words of the King (and that would be Elvis), "Thank ya, Thank ya very much."<br /><br />But the real credit goes to all the attorneys, businesses and individuals who have decided to fight Leo Stoller tooth-and-nail, even though it may have been cheaper (financially) to let him extort them through frivolous lawsuits, defamation, and a variety of other lowlife tactics.<br /><br />I shutter to think where we would be as a society if there weren't people out there still willing to fight on principle, rather than acquiesce in the face of what amounts to nothing more than extortion.<br /><br />The credit goes to all those who have done the 'heavy lifting' to ensure that Leo Stoller reaps the ill-tidings that he sows. <br /><br />Leo Stoller is done-- he knows it, the courts know it, and anyone familiar with the subject knows it as well. Now it's time to--pardon butchering the English language-- make sure that he stays done.<br /><br />And it's people like you who have made the Leo Stoller Truth Serum Blog an incredibly popular Internet destination.<br /><br />So, once again, 'Thank ya, thank ya very much.'<br /><br />Peace out.<br /><br />Chili Palmer<br />http://stollerexposed.blog.comChili Palmerhttp://stollerexposed.blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-38217304827813164252009-05-13T00:06:00.000-06:002009-05-13T00:06:00.000-06:00Thanks Chili! That's an awesome blog. It's about t...Thanks Chili! That's an awesome blog. It's about time someone took the tim to tell the truth about Leo Stoller!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-76458439215199391272009-04-03T09:40:00.000-06:002009-04-03T09:40:00.000-06:00This is an informative yet entertaining blog that ...This is an informative yet entertaining blog that is dedicated to exposing the real Leo Stoller and his public record of judicial abuse and ethical misconduct.<BR/><BR/>http://stollerexposed.blog.com/4607314/Chilihttp://stollerexposed.blog.com/4607314/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-80331917947120440512007-07-20T13:54:00.000-06:002007-07-20T13:54:00.000-06:00How can nonattorneys provide these legal services?...How can nonattorneys provide these legal services? You may want to report this character to the New Mexico State Bar and the TTAB for unauthorized practice of law.<BR/><BR/>I wonder how he is able to file all these tm applications? Because a signature is required by the principal applicant or an attorney. If he is signing his clients name at the end of the application and/or filling out the application himself, he may be exposing himself to some serious liability.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14162253.post-71962736069040103162007-07-16T16:33:00.000-06:002007-07-16T16:33:00.000-06:00This post was noted at The Trademark Blog by Marty...This post was noted at <A HREF="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2007/07/mr_trademark_v.html" REL="nofollow">The Trademark Blog</A> by Marty. Thanks for noticing.Andrew Oh-Willekehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.com