I don't agree with Professor Bainbridge's analysis (and his views flatly contradict black letter legal doctrine in all fifty states, even if they get a lot of attention academically) and I think that he makes far to much of the distinction between ownership of corporate property and ownership of a share in a corporation as a basis for the claim that corporations cannot be owned.
But, if you want a sincere and vigorous argument that shareholders have too many rights, should be marginalized in corporate governance, and that "Shareholders do not own the corporation," he is your go to man.
No comments:
Post a Comment