Lots of institutional investors make objectively bad investments, involving half the investments in start ups made, and 10% of money invested in startups, often because they place too much faith in the the founders of the businesses.
Do institutional investors invest efficiently?
To study this question I combine a novel dataset of over 16,000 startups (representing over $9 billion in investments) with machine learning methods to evaluate the decisions of early-stage investors. By comparing investor choices to an algorithm’s predictions, I show that approximately half of the investments were predictably bad—based on information known at the time of investment, the predicted return of the investment was less than readily available outside options. The cost of these poor investments is 1000 basis points, totalling over $900 million in my data.
I provide suggestive evidence that over-reliance on the founders’ background is one mechanism underlying these choices. Together the results suggest that high stakes and firm sophistication are not sufficient for efficient use of information in capital allocation decisions.
From a new paper by Diag Davenport (via Marginal Revolution).
No comments:
Post a Comment