The modern Democratic party operates to a great extent like politics is supposed to work in Civics 101, and follow on political theory says that it is supposed to. It has found policies, that its leaders believe are good ones for the nation, that can unite a diverse big tent coalition. Democrats believe that government can be a force for good and want to use it the implement policies that make the world a better place. They go to great lengths to demonstrate with evidence that their policies do indeed do so. They aren't saints, but they also view stupidity, bad character, and malice in their leaders negatively and are generally happy to cast out leaders who demonstrate those traits.
The Republican party, in living history, was a pretty similar organization and movement that assembled a different bundle of policies to unite a different, smaller tent coalition.
But, that Republican party is almost gone and rapidly dissolving, even though most of its top leaders got their political start in that party.
The MAGA Republican party and movement, in contrast, is something else entirely. It absolutely still has its roots in the pre-FDR solid south Democratic party, in the Dixiecrats, and in the post-Southern strategy anti-civil rights Republican party. But unlike the Republican party that preceded it, it doesn't fit the Civics 101 model.
MAGA Republicans don't accept a lot of the bipartisan consensus about many aspects of policy making and governing that preceded it. It is isolationist. It is anti-trade, anti-immigration, anti-NATO, and unconcerned about alliances with foreign dictators. It has no respect for expertise. It doesn't think that government does anything good (and is oblivious to the benefits that its members receive from government), so it isn't troubled by having the government run by incompetent fools. It has strong authoritarian leanings, no commitment to democratic ideals, and little concern for the rule of law. It sees power as a tool to utilize to fight culture wars and its political opponents, rather than as a means to advance the greater good
Republican political leaders know perfectly well that most of President Trump's executive branch appointees, like RFK, Jr., are incompetent idiots whose only redeeming quality is their momentary personal loyalty to Trump. Most of them are also well aware that many of the policies that Trump is pushing for are objectively bad ones.
Then why do these Republican leaders back Trump anyway?
They can read the room. They know that they face mafia style backlash from Trump if they cross him. They also know that their not terribly bright constituents in the MAGA base firmly support Trump (or at least have until very recently within Trump's second term when they've discovered personally, the hard way, how bad his policies really are) seeing any deviation from Trump's agenda as a betray of Trump's MAGA base including them. The MAGA base also sincerely believe in a lot of the misguided elements of Trump's agenda because unlike most Republican leaders, they don't know any better.
Billionaires and the political representatives of many big businesses also know personally well that Trump is a horrible person who supports mostly bad policies who is basically trying to destroy the federal government from the inside. But, for them, the immense tax cuts that Trump has delivered to them, and the dismantling of federal laws and regulations that cost them money have seemed worth it to them so far.
The conservative leaning members of the college educated upper middle class, who used to work in think tanks formulating conservative policies that they thought furthered the national interest on a basis similar to that of their liberal peers, who served as senior civil servants, and served as professionals in roles that either supported conservative economic and religious interests, or were at least apolitical, meanwhile, have abandoned the Grand Old Party in droves, some to be unaffiliated politically, some to be libertarians, and some to become "moderate" and "neo-liberal" Democrats. Fools loyal to MAGA and Trump's cult of personality, and powerful hypocrites, have rushed in to fill the vacuum that they upper middle class conservatives left behind.
The agenda of Trump and his MAGA cult of personality isn't sustainable. But it wasn't really meant to be. The objective of MAGA is to burn it all down, and to entrench far right cultural dominance and political power now, knowing that in the long run, the democratic process and respect for the rule of law and settled political norms, run fairly, will undermine those objectives.
Destruction can be accomplished more quickly than building something that works. So, it doesn't have to last long. And, if the MAGA base comes to realize that the face eating leopard they supported ate their faces once the damage done is irrevocable, that's their tough luck in the eyes of the billionaires and far-right cranks who actually benefit from its agenda. By then, if the MAGA agenda is successful, they will have dug the United States (and even the larger world) into a hole that will be very hard to get out of again.
The system struggles to stop them. Trump has installed enough people loyal to him that share his far from the mainstream agenda in key institutions like the U.S. Supreme Court, the military, and senior government offices that he wasn't supposed to be able to oust and oust, and key policies that he wasn't supposed to have the legal right to control, that the systems and people designed to stop him aren't doing their jobs. The system wasn't designed to to stop a President who had no respect for his oath of office, no commitment to the good of the nation, no respect for the rule of law, and immense political power arising from a base brainwashed by decades of lies from clergy, Republican political leaders, and cynically manipulative conservative mass media outlets that jettisoned their journalist ethics long ago.
Of course, the willingness of the MAGA base to be manipulated and accept these lies didn't come from nowhere. It isn't that information that reveals that these are lies isn't available. It isn't that members of the MAGA base unanimously agree that Trump has good character.
They are motivated to accept a false worldview because the last half century of American progress has left them behind and greatly diminished their socio-economic status in relative terms. They are willing to take the gamble of destroying the system because of they feel that it has done nothing for them, and that they have no prospects of improving their lot within it.
Most of them made a bad bet. Trump's agenda will leave them worse off and reveal to them that they actually did have something to lose in the system that they are trying to destroy. The policies that they thought were the problem aren't the source of their dismay. Their future prospects within the system that they support destroying were better than they believed them to be. But, now that they've made that bet, a psychological unwillingness to admit that they've been duped and made a mistake, and the fact that much of the damage to both the system and the political process has already been done, makes remedying their mistake difficult.
The situation could still be turned around: If enough of the MAGA base is disillusioned fast enough. If enough old guard Republicans and conservative judges who are hypocrites wake up to the fact that the end game isn't a good one before it is too late. If Trump dies or implodes (which is a bet the left is trying to make by pushing the Epstein files issue) and no successor to Trump as the leader of the MAGA movement arises.
But if it is turned around, the most likely failure mode for MAGA will be a dramatic collapse of the entire political movement. It will look like an economic bubble popping. It will look like the sudden death of the Whig party in favor of the new Republican party shortly before the Civil War. It will look like the collapse of Naziism at the end of World War II, or the collapse of the Soviet Union. It will look like the post-Herbert Hoover Republican Party of the 1930s. It might even look like the French Revolution with guillotines and all.
There isn't much room for a middle ground business as usual alternation of power at the margins at this point.
3 comments:
Hum... I don't follow politics at all in the Trump era (too much psychic pain), but it's impossible to not get some exposure. If we were smart super-villains in a underground lair in the Alps, and had planned all this out, what would the high level strategy be? First objective: force the elite to acknowledge that the lower-middle class can not be ignored. They (MAGA types) can and will bring down the temple if their concerns are not addressed in a legible manner. Second: punish the elite for being assholes about all this and pissing on the lower-middle class. Punishment signaling is more effective if costly. The cost shows you really care, right? Thirdly: All those educated folks who thought they were the bomb, doing research on all sorts of cools stuff? Well, they're never going to feel as good (and secure) about those cool jobs again. You're living off the fat of the land dudes.
@Guy Except that this evil plan doesn't look two steps ahead.
Trump's policies are going to destroy the U.S. agriculture industry and rural America driving a lot of red state folks into blue cities. It is already destroying manufacturing jobs and preventing people from investing in America. It undermines U.S. beer and whisky makers. It undermines rural schools more than urban ones, and rural healthcare more than urban healthcare. It endangers the lives of blue collar workers a lot more than it does the lives of white collar workers. Urban blue America is a lot more resilient than rural and small town red America. When grocery store prices rise due to tariffs and immigration enforcement, urban college educated folks can afford it, but small town high school educated folks can't.
Trump 2.0 is like Hurricane Katrina but targeted at all of Red America. The hardest hit states are places like Nebraska, Iowa, and Alabama. People in those places are going to have to abandon their marginal farms and small towns and move to unfashionable big city suburbs and will lose their autonomy and political power in the process.
You comment about moving from the marginal small towns to the marginal cities really hit too close the heart! When I was back in Ava MO last year for the 50th high school reunion I meet several old friends that were very proud that they were still living on (if not working) the old family farms. But on the way out to their farm I would point and ask what happened to the So-and-sos? Sold out to some St. Louis or KC professional as a vacation farm or (generally failed) investment. (Came to one place on a road where the county had given up maintenance and the road was going back to nature. Had to use 4WD through that section.) Why didn't their kids take the place? They weren't willing to live so far out of town that cable was not available, or some similar song. We had a rule posted for the reunion "no politics!" But some folks talked it anyway and the breakdown was what you might expect: males in marginal jobs (in that part of Missouri that would include most farmers) mainly pro Trump, females split 50/50 based somewhat on domestic tranquility, and educated folks (mainly living elsewhere) strong anti Trump.
Post a Comment