02 April 2024

Hamas, The Houthis, Hezbollah, Iran, And ISIS-K

Hamas and the Houthis have provoked the responses that they predictably received with wide popular support for their actions.

The decision of Hamas to conduct the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel still had strong majority support among Gazans months after the attack when the devastating consequences of that decision were clear. 

Likewise, the Houthi attacks on shipping and U.S. warships in the Red Sea are a boost to Houthi political support and legitimacy in the parts of Southern Yemen which it controls that is home to 70% of the population of Yemen, despite the fact that the insurgency it has waged there has led to a catastrophic humanitarian disaster there.

Every bit of Israeli and Western military response in Gaza and against the Houthis was deliberately provoked and had broad popular support. In both places, large majorities actively wanted to inflict harm on the U.S. and to obliterate Israel entirely. And, Gaza also continues to keep 100 or so Israeli hostages and has done nothing to surrender.

So, in both cases, while there is clearly significant suffering and plenty of people in each place, like children did nothing to deserve it, neither population is very sympathetic. Each of them brought what they are experiencing upon themselves through deliberate provocation and evil conduct. 

Iran's Role

Of course, Iran is to blame too, for giving them firepower and intelligence that they otherwise would have lacked, and for egging them on behind the scenes. Iran has played a similar role in providing capabilities for and egging on Hezbollah which has waged war on Israel for Lebanon for decades, and Shiite Islamic militias in Iraq and Syria.

Iran's role in world affairs is complicated. 

The war in Yemen is a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia to a great extent, yet the two countries recently reached a Chinese brokered peace accord. China is also looking to strengthen its ties to the Houthis as a way to exempt its own merchants from Houthi piracy. China has previously joined naval coalitions against Somalian pirates in the same region. On the other hand, China is lukewarm toward Russia since it can't alienate its Western trading partners too badly, and has pulled back a majority of of expatriates and economic investments in Africa in the last five years or so, after having spent years trying to build economic and political influence in Africa and across the second and third worlds.

Iran is a key military supplier and source of military technology for both Russia and North Korea as a result of the military industrial capabilities it was forced to develop for itself after decades of Western sanctions. It probably has a few nuclear weapons, has proven it has long range missile capabilities, and its naval might in the Persian Gulf is rivaled upon plausible U.S. naval adversaries only by Russia, China, and North Korea. Iran has also not refrained from using its military capabilities on occasion and has designs on making Shiite majority Iraq into one of its client states.

Yet, Iran reached a treaty, from which Trump promptly withdrew, with the U.S. during President Obama's administration. Its democracy, while flawed and subject to a theoretic veto, is more of a real democracy than most of the Middle East and West Asia. While Iran presented itself to the world as a Shiite theocracy, it actually have considerable religious diversity and is almost as far along the path towards secularism as places like the U.S. and Ireland in terms of grass roots belief, even though the waning religious conservatives have the upper hand in terms of political power. Iran would be a natural place for an Islamic analog to the modernizing Protestant Reformation in Europe to emerge under the right circumstances. Iran has oil wealth, but unlike many other reasonably developed Islamic countries, also has a substantial commercial and manufacturing sector, leaving it in circumstances that have more in common with Turkey and Egypt, than with Saudi Arabia and UAE and Brunei which are dominated by oil wealth, or Yemen and Afghanistan which have little more than subsistence farming interrupted by long periods of civil war.

Israel's Overkill

Israel's response in Gaza has probably been overkill although it is also completely understandable. Hamas and kindred Islamist movements in Gaza, the West Bank, and across the Middle East have been trying to exterminate Israel and to wipe Jews from the face of the Earth almost since its inception in 1948. When Israel gave Gaza more autonomy and withdrew from direct supervision of the region, the Palestinians put Hamas in charge and Israel got terrorist bombings, endless rocket attacks, and the October 7 massacre in return.

President Biden treads the difficult path of not adding aid and comfort to those who would destroy Israel, while simultaneously trying to mitigate humanitarian suffering in Gaza. And, contrary to the views of many on the left, Israel is not just an American puppet that is compelled to do the bidding of an American President in response to an existential threat to it and its people.

About ISIS-K

As an aside, the terrorist attacked recently carried out at a concert in Moscow that killed about 144 people and seriously injured at least 100 more was the work of four Tajik terrorists affiliated with ISIS-K. ISIS-K is one of the main opponents of the Taliban in Afghanistan, although they obviously have no problem with the idea of an Islamist theocracy. 

ISIS-K stands for Islamic State - Khorasan, a reference to the 7th and 8th century CE kingdom in what is now Islamic Central Asia that included "western Afghanistan, northeastern Iran, the eastern halves of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, western Tajikistan, and portions of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan." The region was first united under the pre-Islamic Sasanian Persian empire, and then became part of the first two Sunni Islamic Caliphates:

First established in the 6th century as one of four administrative (military) divisions by the Sasanian Empire, the scope of the region has varied considerably during its nearly 1,500-year history. Initially, the Khorasan division of the Sasanian Empire covered the northeastern military gains of the empire. . . .With the rise of the Umayyad Caliphate, the designation was inherited and likewise stretched as far as their military gains in the east, starting off with the military installations at Nishapur and Merv, slowly expanding eastwards into Tokharistan and Sogdia. Under the Caliphs, Khorasan was the name of one of the three political zones under their dominion (the other two being Eraq-e Arab "Arabic Iraq" and Eraq-e Ajam "Non-Arabic Iraq or Persian Iraq"). Under the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates, Khorasan was divided into four major sections or quarters (rub′), each section based on a single major city: Nishapur, Merv, Herat and Balkh.

The Abbasid Caliphate gots its start in Khorasan around 750 CE, was a high water mark of the Islamic empire in a golden age which lasted more than five centuries until 1258 CE, and persisted in some form for more than two and a half centuries after that, until the 1517 CE when the Ottoman Empire replaced them. The Ottomans, in turn, were the most powerful Islamic country in the world and expanded well into the Balkans, for centuries, but then faded in a long, slow decline, until it fell, roughly the end of World War I, when the current politics of the Middle East began when the colonial powers that won in World War I drew the boundaries of the modern Middle Eastern states and picked the rulers for those countries.

The Abbasid Caliphate or Abbasid Empire (/əˈbæsɪd/ or /ˈæbəsɪd/; Arabic: الْخِلَافَة الْعَبَّاسِيَّة, romanized: al-Khilāfa al-ʿAbbāsiyya) was the third caliphate to succeed the Islamic prophet Muhammad. It was founded by a dynasty descended from Muhammad's uncle, Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib (566–653 CE), from whom the dynasty takes its name. They ruled as caliphs for most of the caliphate from their capital in Baghdad in modern-day Iraq, after having overthrown the Umayyad Caliphate in the Abbasid Revolution of 750 CE (132 AH). The Abbasid Revolution had its origins and first successes in the easterly region of Khorasan, far from the bases of Umayyad power in Syria and Iraq. The Abbasid Caliphate first centered its government in Kufa, modern-day Iraq, but in 762 the caliph Al-Mansur founded the city of Baghdad, near the ancient Babylonian capital city of Babylon and Persian city of Ctesiphon. Baghdad became the center of science, culture, and invention in what became known as the Golden Age of Islam. This, in addition to housing several key academic institutions, including the House of Wisdom, as well as a multiethnic and multi-religious environment, garnered it an international reputation as the "Centre of Learning".

The Abbasid period was marked by dependence on Persian bureaucrats (such as the Barmakid family) for governing the territories as well as an increasing inclusion of non-Arab Muslims in the ummah (Muslim community). Persian customs were broadly adopted by the ruling elite, and they began patronage of artists and scholars. Since much support for the Abbasids came from Persian converts, it was natural for the Abbasids to take over much of the Persian tradition of government. Despite this initial cooperation, the Abbasids of the late 8th century had alienated both non-Arab mawali (clients) and Persian bureaucrats.

The political power of the caliphs was limited with the rise of the Iranian Buyids and the Seljuq Turks, who captured Baghdad in 945 and 1055, respectively. Although Abbasid leadership over the vast Islamic empire was gradually reduced to a ceremonial religious function in much of the caliphate, the dynasty retained control of its Mesopotamian domain during the rule of Caliph al-Muqtafi and extended into Iran during the reign of Caliph al-Nasir. The Abbasids' age of cultural revival and fruition ended in 1258 with the sack of Baghdad by the Mongols under Hulagu Khan and the execution of al-Musta'sim. The Abbasid line of rulers, and Muslim culture in general, re-centred themselves in the Mamluk capital of Cairo in 1261. Though lacking in political power (with the brief exception of Caliph al-Musta'in of Cairo), the dynasty continued to claim religious authority until a few years after the Ottoman conquest of Egypt in 1517, with the last Abbasid caliph being Al-Mutawakkil III.

And, as an aside, who were the Sasanians

The Sasanian Empire or Sassanid Empire, also known as the Second Persian Empire or Neo-Persian Empire, was the last Iranian empire before the early Muslim conquests of the 7th to 8th centuries. Named after the House of Sasan, it endured for over four centuries, from 224 to 651, making it the second longest-lived Persian imperial dynasty after the Arsacids of the Parthian Empire.

6 comments:

Dave Barnes said...

I fault the Israeli government for their failure to assimilate the Arab population starting in 1967 when Israel took the land in war.
If they had started then with a 50-year plan, they would not be where they are today.

andrew said...

Fair. But they didn't.

I think they were insecure about their ability to form a national identity as a Jewish state from disparate groups of Jews all over the world, and were afraid that their grand experiment in Zionism would fail if they did that.

We are where we are today.

I don't think that an integrated one-state solution is feasible, and I don't think that there is enough goodwill and competence available to make two-state solution viable either.

If Jordan could be cajoled to absorb the West Bank and Israeli settlers were evicted from the West Bank by Israel in the process, that would be a good start.

Getting Egypt to take Gaza would be a harder sell, and this is even less viable now.

One reason that even a two-state solution or an Egyptian annexation of Gaza won't work now is that the last six months of war there have destroyed so much infrastructure that even if there was a ceasefire and the fighting stopped tomorrow, it would take many years of construction and lots of money to restore the number of people that Gaza can support in a sustainable way to pre-October 7 levels.

Gaza city is mostly rubble. Hundred of thousands of apartments, many hospitals, a large share of all municipal offices, thousands of retail stores and office buildings, countless legitimate utility tunnels in addition to its illicit tunnels, the electrical grid, many water mains, and more have been destroyed to the point where the only safe option is to demolish what is left and start over from scratch.

Maybe Gaza would be able to meaningfully support a million people in a normal way after a year of reconstruction. But it would probably take five or ten years of work, with uninterrupted peace and financing which would be a low return, high risk investment, to return it to October 6, 2023 conditions. And, who would run Gaza in that time frame?

Allowing Hamas to conduct Gaza's self-governance would be a deal breaker for the Israelis who have near absolute control there when push comes to shove. Israel probably isn't keen on closely supervising rebuilding for millions of people who want them all dead either. You need something like a colonial governorship from someone tolerable to both Gazans and the Israelis. And, even then, having most of the several million Gazans live in that rubble and privation for five or ten years in tent cities living off international aid and little else isn't very viable.

Exiling most of the Gazans permanently it probably a better option, and if they were spread over several Islamic countries - perhaps Iran, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Libya, Algeria, Iraq, etc. it might be bearable for all involved.

neo said...

World Central Kitchen founder José Andrés says Israel targeted staff in Gaza 'car by car'

World Central Kitchen (WCK) founder José Andrés has accused Israeli forces in Gaza of targeting his aid workers "systematically, car by car".

Monday's strike which killed seven members of his staff was not a mistake, he said, repeating that Israeli forces had been told of their movements.

WCK workers from Australia, Canada, Poland, the UK and the US were killed as well as their Palestinian colleague.

Israel says the strike was a "grave mistake" and has apologised.

It has also promised an independent investigation.

According to the charity, the aid convoy was hit while leaving the Deir al-Balah warehouse, "where the team had unloaded more than 100 tonnes of humanitarian food aid brought to Gaza on the maritime route".

The convoy was made up of three vehicles, including two that were armoured, which clearly displayed the charity's logo. All three were hit during the strike.

Speaking to Reuters news agency on Wednesday, the Spanish-American celebrity chef said this was not a "bad luck situation where, 'oops,' we dropped the bomb in the wrong place".

The bodies of six of the dead WCK workers have since been taken from Gaza into Egypt to be repatriated.

Their Palestinian colleague was buried in his hometown in Rafah, southern Gaza, on Tuesday.

Humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip is in doubt after WCK - a key provider of aid to the territory - suspended operations.

The UN announced it was pausing movements at night for at least 48 hours to evaluate the security situation.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/world-central-kitchen-founder-jos-211305800.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink

Anonymous said...

The problem with normalizing any of the results of israel's conquests, even in your proposed accession of the West Bank to Jordan, is that you will set precedent for tendentious, and in most material senses false, pseudohistorical narratives to be used in active, baseless colonization. It gives case for Chinese delusions that Central Asia is theirs because of a commandery or two, over a millennium ago. By the ironic invocation of blood and soil on the part of israel's founders, we have now erased any necessity for such a thing to be true in claiming ethnic ownership of land. If roughly 50% Levantine jews, emigrant for nearly two millennia (one can hardly consider the wealthy trading colonies in the Western Roman empire "refugees" or "exiles"), can monopolize the use of land and wholesale execute and banish the continuous inhabitants time immemorial (for Palestinians were much less changed), the Chinese may cite traces of Song-era Sinitic admixture as grounds to annex Vietnam and eliminate its inhabitants. This is merely one possible analogous scenario. I'm sure you'll insult me as you did the last time I posted, which is unfortunate because I generally respect you.

Creating new possibilities of spontaneous and irrational genocide is far more dangerous and absurd than a program of outreach that correctly identifies the jewish heritage of Palestinians and seeks to convert them. Once people get their hands on the material comforts of modernity through integration, any notion of senseless violence will wash away. Of course, such thinking charitable to ashkenazim, whom previously designed a racial caste system to contain Sephardim and Mizrahim. I have no doubt they would be equally unkind to (re-)converted Palestinians.

Bucking international law, sanctioning mass bloodshed in service of ahistorical fantasies and in support of a religiously radicalizing, intellectually declining population of burgeoning fascists in no way helps global stability, nor does it approach justice. Any victory for israel will only feed the thirst amongst demographically ballooning orthodox zealots for expansionism. It's a nuclear-armed entity whose fallback plan is to initiate global annihilation ("Samson option"). Their politics are rife with petty corruption. American military technology and intelligence are sold by them to the PRC. Do not forget that their leading class of ashkenazim are afflicted with many psychometric anomalies that compromise rationality and trustworthiness, notably a mean in trait neuroticism very significantly higher than those of Europeans and East Asians. It is not a rational state, nor trustworthy; it is not an ally. By all means it should be a pariah, and stifled at every turn by any and all greater powers.

Anonymous said...

As for Iran, you should know that the israelis themselves admitted years ago that there is no evidence of nuclear weaponry. The public American and israeli position is that Iran no longer has an active nuclear weapons program. Some scholars say that it is possible that the Iranians possess sufficient a theoretical understanding that there may be a design on the table, which could be assembled in an emergency, however it is absolute consensus that there is not one bomb. Such claims are unsubstantiated fear-mongering.

Iran has no viable vehicles for delivering a warhead, if they ever succeeded in miniaturizing one to the degree required. israeli and American acts of sabotage have reduced the reliability of Iran's rocket arsenal considerably. There are some indications the guidance modules rely on smuggled Western technology, which makes israel's GPS jamming an effective counter.

Iran poses virtually no direct threat to any of their neighbours, nor to israel. They are largely impotent outside of the export of their second-rate munitions. The army is hollow, and the IRGC is ill-suited to anything but a desperate war of defence employing human bodies more than armour. They have little logistics to speak for. Sanctions have long been as effective at strangling their military as they have at immiserating the civilian population.

Please do not take offense to my interjection. I have always enjoyed your writing and I continue to wish you the best, as a longtime reader.

Anonymous said...

Lastly, it is important to acknowledge that the israelis have previously confessed to supporting Hamas as a method for dividing the Palestinian authority and weakening Fatah. You can find quotes of israeli politicians, in israeli publications for that one. It was a Hobson's choice, for a population israel participated in radicalizing.

They understand the power of poor PR. A weak, disorganized and irascible populace subject to continuous provocation under confinement will react predictably, in a way that can be spun on television. Especially if you have reasonable control over what is broadcast, by murdering journalists.