09 August 2022

Another Path For Transhumanism: Design Improvements

When one thinks about the prospects of genetic engineering and other ways of improving the human body and mind, which is basically what "transhumanism" is about, cosmetic improvements and functional improvements come to mind. (The engineering challenges of actually writing and not merely reading a genome are not insubstantial but they are not entirely insurmountable either.)

But many people fail to appreciate the many design flaws in the human body from wisdom teeth, to tail bones, to the appendix, to the design flaws in the human eye, to immune system gaps that have to be addressed with vaccines. Improving these flaws is one obvious and not very ethically troubling task for genetic engineering.

The human eye is marvelous but also very poorly designed. The poor design is evidence against intelligent design and in favor of the “unguided, unplanned, messy, quirky, and historically contingent” process of evolutionary design. A short piece from 2008, Suboptimal Optics: Vision Problems as Scars of Evolutionary History, does a nice job explaining.

Most well known is that the wiring is backwards.
The most obvious design flaw of the retina is that the cellular layers are backwards. Light has to travel through multiple layers in order to get to the rods and cones that act as the photoreceptors. There is no functional reason for this arrangement—it is purely quirky and contingent.

Even in a healthy and normally functioning eye, this arrangement causes problems. Because the nerve fibers coming from the rods and cones need to come together as the optic nerve, which then has to travel back to the brain, there needs to be a hole in the retina through which the optic nerve can travel. This hole creates a blind spot in each eye. Our brains compensate for this blind spot so that we normally do not perceive it—but it is there.

From a practical point of view, this is a minor compromise to visual function, but it is completely unnecessary. If the rods and cones were simply turned around so that their cell bodies and axons were behind them (oriented to the direction of light), then there would be no need for a blind spot at all.
Cephalopod’s like octopuses took a slightly different evolutionary path and have a better design:


But the reversal of the wiring isn’t the only design flaw.
The arrangement of the extraocular muscles—the muscles that move the eyes—is also difficult to explain without appealing to evolutionary contingency. There are more muscles than are minimally necessary and yet there is no functional redundancy. In order to move a sphere in any direction, only three muscles would be necessary, evenly spaced like the legs of a tripod. The human eye has six—the superior, inferior, lateral, and medial rectus, and the superior and inferior oblique. And yet, despite the extra three muscles, the loss of function of any one muscle causes an impairment of eye movement and results in double vision or displaced vision. A more frugal design with only three muscles would be more efficient and less prone to malfunction, as there are fewer components to break down.

If the eye were to be designed with more than the minimal three muscles, then it would make sense to arrange the muscles so that the loss of one or even more would not impair eye movement.
From here via Marginal Revolution which also has some interesting comments.

Russian Casualties Per U.S. DOD And Other Updates

The initial Russian invasion force in Ukraine was about 150,000. About half of them have been killed or wounded during the five and a half months of the war to date according to the U.S. Department of Defense yesterday (an estimate almost twice as high as the 41,500 estimated by the Ukrainian Department of Defense as of August 4, 2022).

Between 70,000 and 80,000 Russians have been killed or wounded during the war in Ukraine, Colin Kahl, Defense Department undersecretary for policy, said during an on-camera briefing at the Pentagon on Monday.
“I think it’s safe to suggest that the Russians have probably taken 70 or 80,000 casualties in less than six months. Now that is a combination of killed in action and wounded in action, that number might be a little lower, little higher, but I think that’s kind of in the ballpark,” Kahl said.
Kahl said that number of casualties from Russian forces is “remarkable” considering Russia has “achieved none of Vladimir Putin’s objectives” since invading Ukraine at the end of February.

“The Ukrainian morale and will to fight is unquestioned, and much higher I think than the average will to fight on the Russian side, so I think that gives the Ukrainians a significant advantage,” Kahl added.

Via CNN

Either way, it is clear that Russia has taken heavy losses in personnel and in equipment in the five and a half month war, and that Russia continues to take additional casualties incrementally, every day. Russia's conventional war fighting ability in Europe is greatly compromised.

There continues to be no satisfactory explanation for the utter failure of Russia to gain air superiority despite a Russian air force with advanced fighter and bomber aircraft and officially claimed numbers of aircraft that vastly overwhelm Ukraine's.

Russia has made some territorial gains in the East and Southeast, effectively creating a land bridge of Crimea and taking the far northeast of Ukraine, but much of this Ukrainian territory had already been controlled since 2014 (marked with diagonal lines in the map below).

This isn't unquestionably secure either. Russia's naval control over the Black Sea has been impaired, and there were explosions yesterday at an ammunition dump at a Crimean airbase and there was another strike on a rail line near Crimea.

Russian control of the most pro-Russian areas of Ukraine also solidifies pro-Western political forces within Ukraine. 

The Ukraine war has pushed Finland and Sweden into NATO. And, Russia continues to face unprecedented international sanctions even as Ukraine has finally today started to export its grain across the Black Sea. Russian war crime also continue to dog it in a way that may impact individual Russian soldiers for decades to come.

Of course, this doesn't mean that all is well on the Ukrainian side. Ukraine has also suffered immense military casualties and losses of military equipment (although the military equipment of Ukraine is being replenished much more rapidly and with superior gears from Western allies than Russia equipment). And, unlike Russia, Ukraine has suffered immense civilian casualties, rapes by Russian forces, and destruction (and sometimes outright looting) of Ukrainian civilian property by Russian forces. Ukrainian refugees have fled in vast numbers all over the world.

So far, Russia has retaliated against Ukraine's allies mostly by shutting off their access to Russian natural gas pipelines. The possibility of a nuclear strike by Russia seems like less of an imminent threat than it did earlier in the war, despite the fact that its conventional military efforts have floundered, in substantial part due to Western assistance provided to Ukraine.

08 August 2022

The World's Only Underwater Submarine Battle

Tom Clancy notwithstanding,
only one submarine battle has been fought underwater in over 100 years of modern submarine warfare — it was a World War II action that saw a British sub with limited firepower attack a much larger German adversary.
From here. An artist's impression of the battle can be found below:


There have been a small number of other cases, however, where a submerged submarine successfully hit a surfaced opposition submarine.

The world's only undersea submarine battle took place on February 9, 1945 near Bergen, Norway (more than 77 years ago).  The battle itself took less than half an hour.

Allied intelligence had learned that a particular German submarine was planning to cross the Arctic Circle to deliver key military equipment to Japan and laid in wait. The British sub missed the German submarine's first pass, but located it when the German submarine turned around after experiencing problems with its diesel engines.

British fast attack submarine HMS Venturer fired all eight of its torpedoes in rapid succession (it had only four torpedo tubes and had to reload them once), because the larger German U-864 submarine started to take evasive action. Seven torpedos missed. But one torpedo was a direct hit and sunk the submarine. There was no return fire.

Which Countries Are Considered More Evil Than They Are, Or Less So?

In this context, evil refers to disregard for human rights, disregard for their own citizens' well being, authoritarianism, global scale environmental harm,  and aggressiveness in international affairs. This list is (not yet) comprehensive.

Countries that are less evil than conventional wisdom:

1. Cuba

2. Iran

3. Nicaragua

Countries that are more evil the conventional wisdom:

1. Saudi Arabia

2. United Arab Emirates

3. Hungary

4. Kuwait

Evil leaning countries correctly rated for evilness in conventional wisdom:

1. North Korea

2. Russia

3. Syria

4. Afghanistan

5. Myanmar

6. Venezuela

Some cases are particularly difficult to evaluate, and are hard to assign a single "evil index", because they are pretty good in some dimensions, and pretty bad in others. These countries include:

1. China

2. Israel

3. United States

4. Turkey

Countries that were historically quite evil, and are in a transitional period whose ultimate outlook is unclear:

1. Uzbekistan

2. Sudan

3. Somalia

4. Libya

5. Albania

Countries that aren't so much evil as in disarray:

1. Haiti

2. Honduras 

3. El Salvador

4. Belize

5. Guatemala

6. Botswana

Countries with active wars or active insurgencies in their territory (some are also on other lists)

1. Ethiopia

2. Yemen

3. Nigeria

4. Mali

5. Somalia 

6. Syria 

7. Myanmar

8. Israel

9. Phillipines

A County Level Analysis of the Kansas Abortion Amendment Vote

In Kansas, the state supreme court had determined many years ago that the state constitution protected the same right to an abortion as Roe v. Wade. At this summer's primary election in Kansas, in advance of midterm elections, an amendment to the state constitution was proposed that would have eliminated that state constitutional right, which was soundly defeated. 

An analysis of the results on a county by county basis shows a strong correlation between the amount of Trump support in 2020 and support for the measure to amend the Kansas state constitution to eliminate abortion rights, but a large proportion of Trump supporters didn't support this constitutional amendment.

counties that went 80% for Trump in 2020 voted just now (on average) roughly 40% against the amendment.

counties that went 60% for Trump in 2020 voted just now (on average) roughly 55%-60% against the amendment.

a null set but reading off the fitted line*: counties that went 40% for Trump in 2020 voted just now (on average) roughly 70% against the amendment.

From this post and the comments to it.

In a very simple model, 100% of voters who didn't support Trump and 25% of Trump supporters voted against the amendment, with some minor county to county variation.

There is also quite a bit of scatter in the more pro-Trump counties. At the high end, in this simple model, almost 40% of pro-Trump voters opposed the amendment (i.e. were pro-choice) and at the low end only about 20% of pro-Trump voters were pro-choice. 

This suggests that the Republican coalitions in Kansas vary quite a bit from county to county, resulting in different levels of constitutional amendment support based upon the kinds of Republicans in the Republican coalition in each county. In contrast, there is little scatter in pro-Biden counties since Democrats are far more united on this issue in Kansas. 

Of course, the scatter could also be due to Biden voters in strongly pro-Trump counties having different degrees of conservative leanings in these overall very conservative areas (perhaps tracking Catholic v. Protestant proportions in different counties, or the presence or absence of college towns or racial/ethnic minorities in those counties). I don't know the county level demographics of Kansas well enough to determine the likely sources of scatter just from eyeballing the chart and looking at county names. I'd have to do considerable additional research to get a good handle on that question.

Part of the reason for Republican strength from the abortion issue is that a fair share of single issue voters (particularly Roman Catholics, I suspect), vote for Republicans because they are anti-abortion, even though they overall would support Democratic candidates based upon the sum of all other issues.

In contrast, pro-choice Republicans are rarely single issue voters, even though they make up a significant minority of Republicans which helps to resolve the paradox that abortion is a closely divided issue among elected officials nationally, despite clear majorities that don't favor a hard core anti-abortion position on that issue in isolation.

The case of single issue anti-abortion voters also opposing hormonal birth control and IUDs despite the fact that neither hormonal birth control and IUDs are extremely uncontroversial among members of the general public has a similar source.

I particularly like some terminology in a New York Times op-ed about the Kansas vote (although with little data in the op-ed to back it up):

millions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump favor a right to a first-trimester abortion — some of them old-fashioned country-club Republicans, others secular working-class voters or anti-woke “Barstool conservatives” who dislike elite progressivism but find religious conservatism alienating as well.

04 August 2022

Churches Weren't Sanctuaries In Tudor England

We know that playwright William Shakespeare's father avoided going to church, and we also know why he did so. 

He was worried about being arrested at the local church in connection with a now obsolete remedy for non-payment of a private debt upon which a judgment had been entered by a sheriff called a "body execution" (which has some similarities to holding someone in civil contempt for failure to pay a debt, usually a child support debt, although now, this is only permitted, at least in theory, when the debtor has an actual ability to pay the debt).

This information comes from an official report commissioned by the Queen's Privy Council in 1592 of seditionists (mostly people upset over the formation of the Church of England that had broken away from the Roman Catholic Church not all that much earlier), and of other disreputable people in Stratford. 

This report was intended to identify people who were or might aid people that we would call today suspected terrorists and terrorist sympathizers and to distinguish them from ordinary ne'er-do-wells in the area to clarify that the low threat individuals had also been investigated and vetted.

It is a reminder that the role of churches as a sanctuary from civilian law enforcement officers, which still has some non-binding practical force today in the United States, is less ancient than it is often portrayed as being.
[The playwright's father] John Shakespeare was . . . one of a group who “come not to church for fear of process for debt” – that is, to avoid being jailed for failing to repay his creditors.

In Tudor England it was illegal for sheriffs to enter private homes to make arrests; their sting operations were conducted at parish churches. From the late 1570s through the 1590s, when John Shakespeare was sued repeatedly for debt and multiple warrants were issued for his arrest, sheriffs would have waited for him at Stratford’s Holy Trinity Church. In other words, he had good reason to stay away. . . . to describe John Shakespeare as a man who avoided church in order to avoid arrest was their way of saying that he was not a “wilful” recusant—that is, not absent by choice.

From the Oxford University Press Blog

Don't Solve For The Equilibrium

One of the classic catch phrases of both economics and physics is "solve for the equilibrium". It is easier, mathematically and simpler, in  principle, to solve a problem with formulas in which everything has to balance out, than it is to solve a problem and predict a result where everything is out of equilibrium.

But, in the 21st century, we are in a context in which most questions worth asking in the social sciences involves circumstances that are further from an equilibrium state than at almost any other time in human history.

Technology, the fundamentals and system self-interactions that drive economics, the climate, the ecological balance of nature, parenting, dating, marriage, gender, racial identities, the way the political system works, military realities, and more are in intense flux.

Only a handful of political regimes anywhere in the world are more than five generations old. The first powered fixed wing aircraft flew four generations ago in 1903, commercial aircraft entered wide use about a generation later, and two generations later a man had walked on the Moon. Internal combustion engine vehicles fueled with refined petroleum became predominant by 1908 and will probably be a minority of vehicles on the road by 130 years later - the vast majority of non-transportation uses of petroleum have already largely been phased out (except heavy heating oil in a few regions, electricity generation in Hawaii and Alaska, lubricants, plastics, and fertilizers). General Relativity and quantum mechanics are less than four generations old, and when they were invented, Armies still had horse cavalry. Most of the national boundaries in the Middle East were drawn shortly after World War II. 

Jews started to return to Israel in the 1920s, after by tradition, about 1850 years in the diaspora, and the State of Israel came into being in 1948. Hebrew was an exclusively a liturgical language and a language used by religious scholars from about 200 CE to 1880 CE, was spoken by a community of about 34,000 people during World War I, and did not start to become a widespread living first language until the 1920s in the British Mandate in Palestine and first became a national language in 1948, about two generations after it started to be revived, when Israel became an independent state (at which point about 80% of Jews spoke it as a first language, and 15% spoke it as a second language).

The home that I live in was built less than a hundred years ago, in 1925 with coal fired steam heat boiler made popular by then recent global Spanish flu pandemic, had a door in the kitchen wall to receive ice deliveries, had a garage sized for a Model T, had galvanized steel pipes, didn't have electricity until it was added in later renovations, and was in a neighborhood that got its start as a streetcar suburb of Denver called "South Denver" before it was annexed by the City of Denver. Coal is now used predominantly to generate electricity in large power plants, in which it has a rapidly decreasing market share, and for "coke" in the steel production process.

Soviet style communism lasted less than 75 years in Europe, where it no longer exists. Many countries in East Asia and Southeast Asia still have nominally communist political systems (none of which are yet 75 years old), but their economies have adopted so many market economy reforms that their economies aren't really communist anymore. These nominally communist regimes are still authoritarian one-party states, but collective ownership of the means of production, and distribution of the fruits of production according to need, is a Marxist pipe dream that Asian regimes that are nominally communist have largely abandoned.

Around the time that my parents were born, the Great Depression wasn't over yet, the airship industry was collapsing, most of Africa and Asia was governed by European colonial powers, the Communists were just an upstart political party in China, and the Soviet Union was alive and well. My in-laws were born during World War II and experienced the Korean War in ways that put their lives at risk. The farm my father grew up on used a horse for farm labor when he was a child. The entire nuclear dimension of military affairs came into being at a time when my parents could read about it in the newspaper, as did the political regimes in Europe, Asia, and Africa. 

When my parents started high school, Latin was a mandatory subject for every college bound high school student and public schools in the South were still segregated by race as a matter of law. All Roman Catholics in the world conducted their church services in Latin at a time when my parents had both finished their undergraduate educations. My parents were first generation college students who earned PhDs. Co-ed dorms didn't exist when my parents were in college. At the time my father served in the Army, it was just in the process of desegregating. 

Long term mortgages and employment based health insurance were first widely used in my parent's lifetimes. My father-in-law was one of the first doctors to use radiology machines more sophisticated than X-Rays and his parents were first generation Christians. 

Over the course of my parents lives, the Republican party went from being a liberal leaning Northern party to a conservative party of the South and rural America. At my father's first job as a professor in Atlanta, Georgia, many of his students had spent at least some of their school years in segregated schools, and some of their African-American friends had first been able to vote in a Presidential election just four years before they arrived in Georgia as a consequence of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. 

My father was on the committee that organized the first Earth Day. My parents were peers of Elvis Presley and disliked the Beatles and pretty much all other kinds of rock musics, well into their 30s, when rock music started to become predominant. Big band music, more than one sub-genres of jazz music, rock music, and the music of "crooners", like Frank Sinatra featured on the Lawrence Welk show on TV, all came into being during their lifetimes before I was born.

Most of the hydroelectric, geothermal, and nuclear power plants in the world were built during my parents lifetimes before I was born, or when I was a child. The vast majority of the wind, solar, tidal power and natural gas fueled power plants powering the electrical grid in the world has come online in my lifetime, and a majority of the wind, solar and tidal power powering the electrical grid in the world has been added during my children's lifetimes.

Polio afflicted tens of thousands of people a year in the United States until after my parents were finished with college; there were ten cases of polio that originated in the United States in the first decade of my life, and there has only been one case of polio from any source in the United States in the last twenty-nine years, which was this year. The concept of autoimmune diseases as a coherently class of ailments was developed after my parents had graduated from college (and after my aunt was first diagnosed with M.S. an autoimmune disease whose true cause has only been ascertained in the last few years).

When I was born, most cars ran on leaded gasoline, most physics and engineering calculations were still done with slide rules, computers took up whole rooms, the primary method of putting information into a computer was a punchcard, formulas in physics journal articles were written by hand, and many rural areas were still served by "party line" telephone service. Early computers (in my lifetime) with the power of my cell phone would have taken the same amount of electricity to operate as a skyscraper. Computer processor power and memory has increased exponentially, and has seen power consumption decrease exponentially, for my entire life. The core components of the Standard Model of Particle Physics were invented in my lifetime. "No fault" divorce, legal recognition for LGBT rights, females making up more than low single digit percentages of lawyers and doctors and professors, the modern concept of attention deficit disorder, the generalized concept of post-traumatic stress disorder, widespread use of statins to control cholesterol, widespread use of student loans for higher education, and the modern environmental movement all came into existence, for all practical purposes, in my lifetime. Obesity rates for both children and adults in the U.S. have roughly tripled from their long term historical norms to current levels during my lifetime. 

The first time I met someone who was openly gay was in college, which is also the first time that I used the Internet, and the first time I'd encountered Muslims face to face, and the first time I'd eaten tofu. The Soviet Union ceased to exist when I was in college. Crime rates hit all time highs around the time that I was in college and have since declined to half century lows. Divorce rates which were once low across the board soared to record highs during my lifetime, then experienced a class divide with divorce rates for college educated couples plummeting and divorce rates for couples without any college educations reaching levels never before seen that continue to rise checked only by couples not bothering to get married when living together and having children at all.

MTV came and went in my lifetime, as did disco, New Wave, eight track tapes, cassette tapes, videodisks, compact disks (CDs), DVDs, and analog broadcast television. Broadcast satellite TV and radio came into wide commercial use in my lifetime and I doubt that either will still be in wide commercial use when I die. Rap and Hip hop were invented in my lifetime and remain vibrant. The proportion of Americans who identify as non-religious has increased by a factor of ten in my lifetime. 

Commercial supersonic aircraft came into being and then ceased to exist in my lifetime, and will renter the market again in a few years.

"Smart bombs", guided missiles, stealth aircraft, and unmanned military drones all entered regular military use in my lifetime.  Amphibious assaults, air to air combat between fighter aircraft in "dog fights", ship to ship battles, submarine to ship battles, ship to submarine battles, and the use of nuclear weapons in war, have become vanishingly rare or non-existent in my lifetime.

The death penalty in the United States was abolished nationally, and then reinstated on a much more restricted basis, in my lifetime. Abortion was first constitutionally protected after my brother and I were born, and has now been denied constitutional protection in my lifetime. Marital rape was criminalized, and domestic violence  and acquaintance rape first began to be taken very seriously by the criminal law in my lifetime, and gay sex between consenting adults was legalized by becoming constitutionally protected in the United States in my lifetime. Serious drunk driving penalties and major reductions in tobacco use both arose in my lifetime.

At my first job as a summer law clerk with a law firm, lawyers were not allowed to use computers or typewriters, we had to dictate everything that we didn't write longhand, leaving typing for a large and almost entirely female corps of secretaries who knew how to use typewriters and early word processors (even though the youngest lawyer in the firm and the law clerks knew how to do so themselves). Legal research, including checking cases to make sure that they had not been overruled or narrowed by subsequent cases, was done almost entirely with dead tree books, because computerized legal research while it existed, was very expensive per minute or per search. At the end of each day, a recent high school graduate would rush to hand deliver all of the firm's court filings to the local court clerk before the office closed at five p.m., and to mail copies of those documents before five p.m. at the local post office that this courier had spent all afternoon photocopying to every party of record in the case and the court with an extra copy to be pinned down with metal clamps in a hard copy paper pleadings file. Lawyers needed to finish their dictations and final handwritten revisions to court documents by three or four o'clock in the afternoon, to allow time for them to be typed by the secretaries, photocopied, delivered to the court clerk, and mailed, before the hard five o'clock deadlines for doing so. All court hearings were held in person.

Now those jobs are gone. All lawyers except men in their sixties or older type their own first drafts of court documents subject to only light editing and proofreading by staff (younger lawyers do their own advanced typesetting as well, while older ones rely on secretaries or paralegals for these formatting tasks), after personally researching cases and statutes online, and then they either personally, or with one paralegal serving several lawyers, e-file the documents to the court and to all other parties in the case by midnight deadlines, often without the final draft ever being printed or manually signed or filed. The client gets an email copy and often there is no paper pleadings file in a case at all. Many non-evidentiary court hearings like status conferences and pre-trial conferences are conducted remotely, as are many mediation sessions (something that also was rare back then, but now is required in almost every case).

Back in the day, many court documents needed to be notarized, in person, with a red ink stamp with a raised embossed seal. Now, the documents that used to be notarized are just signed by the client or witness in pen under penalty of perjury, scanned, and emailed to the lawyer for filing. 

As a result, modern law firms are profoundly more top heavy than they used to be in most kinds of law practices, and lawyers no longer work "banker's hours."

Mass produced electric cars were reinvented in my children's lifetime. I have never owned a car that wasn't made by a Japanese or Korean car company since my children were born. We haven't had broadcast television service at any time in my children's lives. We ended our cable TV service before they started middle school. We discontinued our landline telephone service before my children were in high school. My wife was pregnant with my oldest child when the Euro came into being and about a dozen European national currencies ceased to exist. My children were alive when cryptocurrencies came into being and when same sex marriages were legalized. The Department of Homeland Security, the TSA, the "no fly list", security checkpoints with shoe removal, and limits on carrying liquids arose after my oldest child was born. The U.S. has been a party to low intensity "small" wars for essentially all of my children's lifetimes. The privately enforceable constitutional right to bear arms was first recognized in my children's lifetimes. Lockdown drills at school, in response to numerous mass school shootings, have replaced in my children's generation the duck and cover drills of the Cold War era.

My children don't really remember ever living without the Internet or cell phones. Some of my children's high school textbooks were delivered on electronic tablets and they had homework assignments in high school that included typing mathematical formulas using LaTex computer typesetting. COVID, of course, arose during my children's lifetime. We are still a couple of years away from the U.S. getting its first truly high speed rail line, long after they have become common in Europe and China.

This recitation of historical events reminiscent of Billy Joel's song, "We Didn't Start The Fire" and a few subsequent imitations of its structure, may be a bit excessive and familiar. But, in this post, my real point is that everyone alive today, and our parents, and our grandparents, and even a generation or two beyond them, have never known a time when science, technology, economics, international affairs, culture, and law weren't in periods of breakneck change. 

Austrian-born economist Joseph Schumpeter, who is most famous for his Marxist inspired characterization of dynamic capitalist economies in the long run as a process of "creative destruction", particularly in his 1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, was one of my favorite economists in college. This was because he had a realistic description and astute understanding of the essential features of the big picture of the workings of modern capitalism, when other economists so frequently seemed to lose sight of the forest for the trees attempting to devise simple, theory driven mathematical models of the economy.

It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking about the present as if this is the way that the world has always been and always will be, and one of the most important lessons I learned as a history minor in college was just how untrue that assumption was over far shorter time frames than I ever would have guessed otherwise.

But, solving for an equilibrium in the social sciences that can't be reached in the very short term of a fewer minutes to a few decades, at most, is irrelevant and often counterproductive. 

Change, and not equilibrium, has been the long standing norm for all of living history and all of the oral history and recollections of the vast majority of living people alive today. 

Forcing yourself to almost always consider dynamic models in the social sciences and in predicting the future of technology, is far harder and far less certain than trying to solve for an equilibrium predicted by your theories based upon the present. But, at least doing so avoids the near certainty that any attempt to solve for the equilibrium for any significant period of time will be wrong.

03 August 2022

U.S. Catholic Demographics And Politics

The Roman Catholic church is the largest religious denomination in the U.S. and is the plurality Christian denomination in most U.S. states. Where it is not the plurality Christian denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention is the most common plurality denomination (Kentucky, Virginia, Georgia, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Alaska, Arkansas, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama), with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (North and South Dakota), the main Mormon denomination (Idaho and Utah), and the Methodists (Delaware) each being the plurality denomination in one or two other states.

The Roman Catholic church in the U.S. is a mix of non-Hispanic whites, mostly descendants of Southern European and Irish immigrants in the late 19th century and early 20th century, and recent immigrants, mostly Latino, but also a not insignificant number of recent black and Asian immigrants and their children. 

White Catholics have a lot in common demographically and politically with mainline White Protestants and lean Republican. As in almost all Christian denominations, Catholics who attend church every week tend to be more conservative than those who attend less often.

Some Catholic doctrines (e.g. opposition to abortion) line up with the Republican party in the U.S., while others (e.g. opposition to the death penalty, support for aid to the poor, and a compassionate stance towards immigrants) line up with the Democratic party in the U.S. 

The Catholics as a whole are a swing demographic in U.S. politics and make up a disproportionate share of political moderates and swing voters in the U.S.

The share of people in the U.S. who are Catholic remained almost constant in a period when all other Christian denominations were making up a declining share of Americans, mostly due to Hispanic immigration.

Non-white Catholics are a younger and growing share of U.S. Catholics, but are also leaving the faith after spending more time in the U.S., and in generations after the first generation of immigration, at a higher rate than non-Hispanic white Catholics as they assimilate to the larger U.S. culture. So, it isn't clear that the U.S. Catholic church will become majority non-white in the near future. Currently, a minority of U.S. Hispanics are Catholic, as the share of U.S. Hispanics who are Protestant and not religious has grown (despite a lull in net Latin American immigration since the financial crisis in the U.S.).

According to a more recent Pew Forum report which examined American religiosity in 2014 and compared it to 2007, there were 50.9 million adult Catholics as of 2014 (excluding children under 18), forming about 20.8% of the U.S. population, down from 54.3 million and 23.9% in 2007. 
Pew also found that the Catholic population is aging, forming a higher percentage of the elderly population than the young, and retention rates are also worse among the young. 
About 41% of those "young" raised Catholic have left the faith (as opposed to 32% overall), about half of these to the unaffiliated population and the rest to evangelical, other Protestant faith communities, and non-Christian faith. Conversions to Catholicism are rare, with 89% of current Catholics being raised in the religion; 8% of current Catholics are ex-Protestants, 2% were raised unaffiliated, and 1% in other religions (Orthodox Christian, Mormon or other nontrinitarian, Buddhist, Muslim, etc.), with Jews and Hindus least likely to become Catholic of all the religious groups surveyed. Overall, Catholicism has by far the worst net conversion balance of any major religious group, with a high conversion rate out of the faith and a low rate into it; by contrast, most other religions have in- and out-conversion rates that roughly balance, whether high or low. 
This is credited to the more liberal stance of the church since Vatican II, where conversion to Catholicism is no longer encouraged, and the de-emphasizing of basic Catholic religious beliefs in Catholic education. Still, according to the 2015 Pew Research Center, "the Catholic share of the population has been relatively stable over the long term, according to a variety of other surveys. 
By race, 59% of Catholics are non-Hispanic white, 34% Hispanic, 3% black, 3% Asian, and 2% mixed or Native American. Conversely, 19% of non-Hispanic whites were Catholic in 2014 (down from 22% in 2007), whereas 55% of Hispanics were (versus 58% in 2007). In 2015, Hispanics were 38%, while blacks and Asians were at 3% each. 
Because conversion away from Catholicism as well as dropping out of religion completely is presently occurring much more quickly among Hispanics than among Euro-American whites, Black (2.9% of US Catholic population) and Asian-American Catholics, it is doubtful they will outnumber the latter three categories of Catholics in the foreseeable future. Pew Research Center predicts that by 2050 (when the Hispanic population will be 128 million), only 40% of "third generation Latinos" will be Catholic, with 22% becoming Protestant, 24% becoming unaffiliated, and the remainder, other. This corresponds to a sharp decline in the Catholic percentage among self-identified Democrats, who are more likely to be nonwhite than Republicans. In one study, three authors found that around 10% of US Catholics are "Secularists," "meaning that their religious identification is purely nominal."

From Wikipedia.

According to the same Wikipedia source, about 10% of Americans are ex-Catholics.

The number of U.S. Catholic nuns and priests, both of whom are overwhelmingly white, is declining rapidly, although the nuns are, on average, older and reducing at twice as great a percentage rate. Over the next twenty years, on average, about 2,000 nuns a year will die, but only 20 new nuns will take holy orders each year, while the number of priests will decline at a rate of about 300 a year over the next twenty years on average at the current rate. The number of U.S. priests will be greater than the number of U.S. nuns for the first time in recent history sometime around the year 2025. There is currently about one Catholic priest in the U.S. for every 2,000 U.S. Catholics, a lower ratio of clergy to church adherents than almost any other U.S. Christian denomination.

Since many important U.S. Catholic institutions, like hospitals and schools, are controlled by orders of Catholic nuns, the declining number of nuns leaves those nuns who remain with extraordinary secular power over institutions built up by previous generations of nuns in their orders.

Half of Catholics do believe, or are unsure that, transubstantiation (i.e. that the bread and wine in communion are transformed in the mass service into the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ) is their church's doctrine (it is), but only 31% believe that this is true. 

The facts supporting the analysis above include the following ones:

According to a recent study, less than 1% of nuns in America are under 40 and the average sister is 80 years old. In 2022, there were reportedly fewer than 42,000 nuns in America, which is a 76% decline over 50 years. At the rate sisters are disappearing, one estimate said that there will be fewer than 1,000 nuns left in the United States by 2042, according to the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate.

From ABC News (2022).

The total number of nuns, also called religious sisters, in the United States has fallen from roughly 180,000 in 1965 to about 50,000 in 2014 – a 72% drop over those 50 yearsaccording to the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) at Georgetown University. While the total number of priests (diocesan and religious) also has fallen over that period, it has done so at a much slower rate (from about 59,000 to 38,000, a 35% drop).
Globally, the number of nuns also is declining, but not nearly as fast as it is in the U.S. In 1970, U.S. nuns represented about 16% of the world’s religious sisters; now, American nuns are about 7% of the global total (just over 700,000), also according to CARA.

From Pew (2014). 

Hispanics now account for 40% of all U.S. Catholics, and a solid majority of school-age Catholics. Yet Hispanic Americans are strikingly underrepresented in Catholic schools and in the priesthood — accounting for less than 19% of Catholic school enrollment and only about 3% of U.S.-based priests. . . .
[T]he median age for Hispanic Catholics in the U.S. is 29, compared to 55 for white non-Hispanic Catholics.
While the Hispanic population in the U.S. is sure to grow, the extent of the Catholic Church’s hold on them is uncertain. Last year, the Pew Research Center reported that U.S. Hispanics are no longer a majority-Catholic group, with 47% of them calling themselves Catholic, down from 57% in 2009. The number identifying as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular” increased from 16% to 23%; those identifying as Protestant rose from 23% to 26%.
From the Associated Press (2020).






From Pew (as of 2017).


From Pew (as of 2019).

01 August 2022

How Important Is Real Estate To Different State Economies?

I am surprised at how many states there are in which manufacturing is the biggest contributor to state GDP, as well as by the dominance of real estate in the state GDPs of so many states.

Church Attendance

Younger people are increasingly unlikely to attend church on a regular basis, or at all. But, many young people are not atheists and many attend church sometimes, but only infrequently. The material below comes from a pastor's twitter feed:


Among those born in the early 1930s, 60% attend church weekly. 17% never attend. [Between 33%.]
Among those born in the early 1950s, 32% attend weekly. 29% never attend. [Between 39%.]
Among those born in the early 1990s, 18% attend weekly. 42% never attend. [Between 40%.] . . . 
People do not become religious as they age. I address that myth in my latest book. 
I looked at every 5 yr. birth cohort from 1930 through 1994. Not a single one has a higher rate of affiliation today than they did in 2008.

From here based upon data from the General Social Survey (GSS) (material in brackets mine).

As Robert Jones of the Public Religion Research Institute told Salon in 2017, there's "a culture clash between particularly conservative white churches and denominations and younger Americans" over issues like science, education, and gender equality. Younger people brought up in these churches increasingly reject the sexism, homophobia, and anti-science views of their elders. Since the churches won't reform to be more egalitarian and pro-science, they find that these younger people are walking away altogether.

This isn't entirely true, however. The truth is more complicated. If this were the only thing driving young people away from churches and Christianity you would expect to see a mass migration of young people from conservative Christian churches to mainline Christian denominations, since mainline Christian denominations in the United States largely rejecting sexism and homophobia, and have far less strong anti-science views. But that isn't what has happened. Indeed, mainline Christian denominations saw their attendance fall off before conservative Christian churches caught up with them.

Predominantly white mainline liturgical Christian churches like the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American (ELCA), the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Episcopal Church, the largest Methodist Church denomination, and the Congregational Church are all in membership and attendance free fall as well, among younger people raised in the church and aren't gaining large numbers of converts from more conservative Christian denominations to make up for their losses among young people born into those churches.

Some of this is because mainline Christian denominations demanded little, did not protect a threatened culture, and were more easily discarded when it became socially acceptable to do so because being non-religious reached a tipping point. 

Young people have decided that they can advance their values and find community without the Christian metaphysics and investment of time and effort in activities like Bible study and church attendance. A religious worldview is increasingly out of step with our modern scientific worldview to an extent that has been particularly pronounced as young people form their religious beliefs in childhood and young adulthood. 

The inconvenient statements buried in the Bible, the history of the Christianity, and in basic Christian doctrine, haven't fared well in the face of criticism and closer scrutiny now that it is socially acceptable to question them and to not be affiliated with a church. Young people no longer meekly offer questions in confirmation classes that are quietly set aside with incomplete answers that are deemed by general social consensus to be "good enough."

Some of this is also because conservative Christians have given the Christian "brand" a bad name that young people are disavowing wholesale. The failure of white young people to differentiate between mainline and conservative Christianity is, in part, because historically white, mainline Christian denominations failed to denounce the basically heretical views of their conservative Christian counterparts. The mainline Christians held back from criticizing conservative Christians out of what they viewed as mutual respect and a distaste for conflict, even though conservative Christians were happy to denounce mainline Christians as heretics from the pulpit. As a result mainline Christians have paid the price for not defending the "Christian brand" from being tarnished by conservative Christians.

It isn't as if the world has never seen the trend we are now seeing in the United States. The same trend towards secularization swept Europe decades earlier in the post-World War II period, and the current leader of the Roman Catholic church, Pope Francis, upon taking office put the threat of secularization to the Roman Catholic church at the top of his list of concerns upon taking office. 

Church attendance in most countries in Europe is lower than it is in the United States, where the rate for Christians is 47% (although it varies greatly from state to state from 21% of all adults regardless of religious affiliation in Vermont to 55% in Alabama):


From Wikipedia. Similarly (via the same link), the 2008 European Social Survey found that the following percentage of people in each country never attended church except for special occasions like weddings and funerals:

The remarkable thing is actually that secularization arrived in the United States so much later than it did in Europe, rather than the fact that it happened at all.

Higher SES Friends Lead To Higher Incomes

 
From the New York Times.

Tyler Cohen at Marginal Revolution quotes from the source studies:

There are two new NBER papers written by large teams, headlined by Raj Chetty.  Here is an excerpt from the first paper:

The fraction of high-SES friends among low-SES individuals—which we term economic connectedness—is among the strongest predictors of upward income mobility identified to date, whereas other social capital measures are not strongly associated with economic mobility. If children with low-SES parents were to grow up in counties with economic connectedness comparable to that of the average child with high-SES parents, their incomes in adulthood would increase by 20% on average.

And this as a general introduction to the project:

….we measure and analyze three types of social capital by ZIP code in the United States: (i) connectedness between different types of people, such as those with low vs. high socioeconomic status (SES); (ii) social cohesion, such as the extent of cliques in friendship networks; and (iii) civic engagement, such as rates of volunteering. These measures vary substantially across areas, but are not highly correlated with each other.

The core data are taken from Facebook and anonymized.  And from the second paper:

We show that about half of the social disconnection across socioeconomic lines—measured as the difference in the share of high-socioeconomic status (SES) friends between low- and high-SES people—is explained by differences in exposure to high- SES people in groups such as schools and religious organizations. The other half is explained by friending bias—the tendency for low-SES people to befriend high-SES people at lower rates even conditional on exposure.

There is then this concrete result:

…friending bias is higher in larger and more diverse groups and lower in religious organizations than in schools and workplaces.

The cross-social class connectedness of people varies geographically (red places on the map below are more social class segregated and blue ones are less social class segregated in friendships):


Notably, there is great variation in cross-socioeconomic class connections within both "red states" and counties (politically) and "blue states" and counties (politically).

Within conservative leaning areas, the Great Plains and northern Mountain West are very connected across socioeconomic class lines, while the South and Southwest are very segregated.

Russian Losses According To Ukraine's Defense Ministry


This is a story from one side of the conflict as of August 8, 2022. The leading neutral source admittedly underestimates the losses because of their high standards for confirmation. The reality probably lies between the neutral estimates and the estimate below. But Ukrainian estimates have consistently been more credible than Russia estimates in this conflict.

Six weeks ago, according to the Washington Post: 
The Pentagon estimates that the Russians have lost 2,600 armored vehicles, or about 30 percent of their inventory. That includes about 1,000 tanks and 1,600 armored personnel carriers. The Russians have also fired nearly 70 percent of their precision-guided munitions, and because of Western sanctions, Moscow may be unable to resupply those critical munitions.
In mid-May, based upon news reports, I estimated that the original supply of various Russian heavy systems was as follows with Ukrainian estimates of losses (and with no allowance for Russian resupply of its initial force with additional equipment) as follows:

* 150,000 troops (41,030 lost; 27%)
* 1,880 tanks (1,768 lost; 94%)
* 3,008 artillery vehicles (1,191 lost; 40%)
* 8,648 armored infantry fighting and armored personnel carriers vehicles (4,011 lost; 46%)
* 9,118 other ground vehicles (3,117 lost; 34%).

I don't have before and after estimates for aircraft, helicopters, drones, cruise missiles, and naval resources.

There may be some classification issues present, for example, treating some vehicles that I have classified in another category as tanks for loss purposes.

Losses of troops means deaths, serious injury, capture as prisoners, or desertions.

Analysts cited by the Washington Post (on July 28, 2022) have cautiously opined that Russian forces have started to stall, and that Ukrainian forces are starting to make gains, as a result of Western supplied advanced weapons:
Russian advances in Ukraine have slowed almost to a standstill as newly delivered Western weapons help Ukrainian forces reclaim much of the advantage they had lost in recent months, opening a window of opportunity to turn the tide of the war in their favor again.

Russian troops have made no significant territorial gains since the Ukrainian retreat on July 2 from the eastern city of Lysychansk under withering artillery fire. The retreat gave Russia full control over Luhansk, one of the two oblasts, or regions, that make up the broader eastern Donbas area, and it marked Russia’s only meaningful strategic success since its retreat from territory around Kyiv in April.
Particular credit was given to the U.S. High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) that have been provided to the Ukrainians, which launch guided missiles with 50 mile plus ranges, which is far beyond the range of conventional unguided artillery shells, with far greater accuracy.